The Joe Kaufman For US Congress campaign has announced the endorsement of Niger Innis. Mr Innis and his father, Roy Innis are well-known to conservatives and Republicans. Their group CORE champions civil rights in America.
Here is Innis’ statement provided by the Kaufman campaign:
“I’ve known Joe Kaufman for many many years, going way back when to the days of [TV talk show host] Morton Downey, Jr., when my father Roy Innis was tussling with Al Sharpton, and I can’t think of any better gift that New York can give to Southern Florida than for Joe Kaufman to defeat Debbie Wasserman Schultz and give her this Pink Slip. So I’m endorsing Joe Kaufman, and I hope you come out and support him in November. G-d bless.”
This is amazing that am an that is against hate has endorsed a man that is full of hate. I wonder what the black community and his membership is thinking right now. Plus how conservative can Joe Kaufman be if he supports big government issues like SOPA, PIPA and NDAA!
I believe that CORE would be extrmely upset of Niger Innes choice and Niger should reconsider his endorsement.
It should say This is amazing that a mand that is against hate has endorsed a man full of hate!
Major Gen Paul Vallely, US Army (ret) on CRF w/Steve & Daria
On this show Major General Paul Vallely supported and endorsed Joe Goldner’s position on NDAA and other issues. Listen to the show and here the questions by Joe Goldner! http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stevenrrepub/2012/02/11/major-gen-paul-vallely-us-army-ret-on-crf-wsteve-daria
I HAVE NOT SEEN JOE GOLDNER EVER PUT HIS LIFE ON THE LINE LIKE JOE KAUFMAN. JOE KAUFMAN IS ONE GUY THAT LOVES HIS COUNTRY,AND ISRAEL, PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN AND FIGHTS WHAT HE BELIEVES IN. THANK YOU JOE KAUFMAN FOR EVERYTHING YOU HAVE DONE FOR US AND AMERIICA.. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PASSION FOR PUTTING AMERICA FIRST. BY THE WAY JOE GOLDNER, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ IS A CO-SPONSOR OF SOPA/PIPA. WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT JOE KAUFMAN SUPPORTS SOPA/PIPA
I’m a little disgusted with you, Joe Goldner. Not only are your comments full of horrible grammar, mispellings and untruths, but I just spent an hour of my time listening to Steve Rosenblum’s CFR radio broadcast featuring Maj. Gen. Vallely. YOU DID NOT SPEAK ON THAT RADIO SHOW NOR DID GEN. VALLELY ENDORSE YOU. You called in a question which was asked by Daria. Your question was, ‘…what is Gen. Vallely’s opinion of NDAA” which was not a topic for discussion on this radio broadcast. Gen. Vallely’s topics for the radio show were all military related.
WHAT IS IT WITH YOU AND THIS FANTASY campaign? Your name was mentioned one time on that radio show. I suggest you listen to it…..scroll over to about 63 and you can re-listen for yourself.
AND, Whatever Joe Kaufman’s position, opinion or stand is for SOPA and PIPA, is the right position, opinion and stand to be on. As far as hate goes, Joe Kaufman is against CAIR who supports HAMAS and they want to kill us. Joe Kaufman is against terrorism because they want to kill us. Kaufman is also against every individual and organization that threatens Israel. You must be listening to voices in your head saying what you want to hear. Joe Kaufman has never said he hates anything or anybody. But he has said, time and time again, how much he loves the USA and will continue to fight for our freedom and liberty. Go back to sleep, Goldner.
Forgive me, Red Broward, for being so slow to respond to Goldner’s comments, but I had to do my homework. Once again, VET your candidates………
Just go to Jason Marshall radio show interview and you will here Joe Kaufman in his own words saying he supports SOPA and PIPA! Also as for putting my life on the line I have done that when I was in the Army and I have done that when I was an Auxillary Police Office in the 70 pct during the late 70s and early 80s plus I also was involved in the original block watcher program in 110 and 112 pcts during the late 60s and early 70s. All of them putting my life on the line.
Now I would love for Joe Kaufman answer Jon Stewarts question on the definition of against and the defination of hate! I also would love for him to explain to the Muslim and the black community how he would represent them as a congressman when he has a passion of hate for both of them especially Muslims. Remember you are obligated to take and obay the oath to the constitution as that is what your swear to when you get sworn in. That means you must obay the constitution, which means you must represent all the people not just the select few. Joe Kaufman is a bigot by definition and if I don’t expose the world to that fact, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will and Kaufman will lose big by at least 30 or 40 percent.
Here is the link of the radio show that Kaufman told the whole world he is for big government and supports SOPA and PIPA!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/rightvoice4realchange/2012/01/23/right-voice-for-real-change
As for the General he and I are on the same page and has endorsed my ideas and policies. Get a life and start supporting candidates that are not bigots and are for ALL the people not just a select few!
Oh! By the way as a congressman Kaufman will have to by law represent as a constituent members of CAIR and that will make Kaufman in a conflict of interest situation considering his attacks and his legal actions involving CAIR and that my friend disqualifies him as a candidate. If he can not honestly fufll fill the post and his oath he can not be eligilble to be a congressman.
A QUESTION FOR JOE KAUFMAN! HOW CAN YOU LOOK YOURSELF IN THE MIRROR AND SAY THAT YOU WILL HONESTLY OBEY THE OATH TO WORK FOR ALL THE CONSTITUENTS AS IN THE OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION YOU TAKE WHEN BEING SWORN IN AS A CONGRESSMAN? SOMETHING FOR YOU TO THINK ABOUT!
I don’t know why I’m wasting my time responding to your comments……..but here is the oath that elected Congressional candidates swear to………..notice what it says……..nowhere does it say that a US Congressman must be a loyal representative of an individual or an organization that is not loyal and faithful to the United States of America, but it does state that a US Congressman shall be
loyal to the US Constitution………please read to the end. Thank you.
U.S. Senate Oath of Office
The Constitution contains an oath of office only for the president. For other government officials, including members of Congress, the document specifies only that they “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support the Constitution.”
The First Congress, in 1789, reworked this requirement into a simple fourteen-word oath: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”
At the beginning of the Civil War, Congress expanded the oath. That text is the earliest direct predecessor of the current oath. Then, in August 1862, a section was added, known as the “Ironclad Test Oath.”
It required all civil servants and military officers to swear not only to future loyalty, as required by the existing oath, but also to affirm that they had never previously engaged in criminal or disloyal conduct. Those failing to take the 1862 Test Oath would not receive a salary. Ironically, Congress did not extend coverage of the Ironclad Test Oath to its own members.
In 1884, two decades after the Civil War ended, Congress quietly repealed the Test Oath section, leaving intact what is today’s current affirmation of constitutional allegiance:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
Now, please understand, if an individual or an organization is an enemy of the USA, which Hamas is, and those who support Hamas are, our US Congressmen/women are not obligated to represent them, but they are obligated to bring them to justice.
@frieda. I wear adult diapers. Wet your candidates
Excuse me for taking so long to respond to Goldner’s Jason Marshall radio show, but it is quite long. And, the Joe Kaufman portion is really quite good. Now for your complaint. Joe Kaufman said that SOPA & PIPA were not big personal issues for him, but he understands why a movie producer or musician would want to protect their rights and royalties by preventing unauthorized copies. He also said that if he had been in Congress at the time of voting for SOPA & PIPA, he might probably have voted for the bills. However, he has also stated that he is against cencorship. Now, exactly what these issues have to do with hate is above my pay grade. BTW, I have total control of my bodily fluids. So sorry you’re handicapped.
Freida: Good response to this Joe Goldner. LOL. Almost fell off my chair.
I agree that it is the job of a representative to represent constituents according to the constitution. But I also agree with Frieda that an organization or group of people who are trying to undermine the very foundation of our consitutional democratic republic then it would be treasonous to support them or their actions. In other words you would be trampling on the very oath that you took. I proudly support Joe Kaufman and am grateful for the public exposure he has brought to members of CAIR and what this organization has done and continues to do under the very nose of our federal and central intelligence agencies. I do not see that as being an act of hate but rather an act of honor. Thank goodness for the unselfish and unwavering courage of people like Kaufman for putting country before self. As to SOPA AND PIPA, I too agree that piracy is a problem and I am sure any business owner would not want their work stolen and redistributed without compensation. I do believe that the bills need to have a safeguard in them that would guarantee that if you are legally redistributing that you or your website would not be shut down. There is a doable solution to accommodate both sides of this issue and I believe Kaufman agrees with this. I know Kaufman is not for censorship or illegal activity. For those who screamed so loud about these two bills leads me to believe they knowingly were committing a crime of theft. If that is who Goldner wants to represent then I do not believe that is good for this country. We are a country founded on natural law and theft is one that has never been acceptable under our constitution.
Ladies. May I suggest Karen Harrington is the true conservative choice. She is runs a business, raises a family and keeps a nice home. Case closed
Glad Harrington keeps a nice home, but personally I want someone who has experience in going against those who are trying to fundamentally transform our country from the inside out. The times we find ourselves in demands it.
How about someone that actually work for and fight for all the constituents in the district not the special interest, lobbyist or political hacks. How about someone that actually is one of the people not someone who thinks he or she is above them. How about someone who pledges to support the constitution, someone who will follow what our founding fathers intended this country to be, limited government not big government.
By the way we have laws already on the books protecting copy rights and intellectual properties. That is why if you violate copy right laws you pay the price. You don’t need further laws and you don’t need the federal government to regulate the internet. If SOPA and PIPA ever become law companies like EBAY, Youtube and Wikipedia will go out of business, social networks like Facebook and Twitter will also either be limitted or go our of business. Also blogs like Shark Tank and Red Broward would be shut down and so would some of the radio shows on BlogRadio and Talkshoe.
Everytime government grows we lose more of our freedoms. In this case freedom of speech.
That is why I am oppose to SOPA and PIPA! I am also oppose NDAA for similiar reasons because if you give the federal government a finger they will eventually take the whole body. NDAA can open up a can of worms and our freedoms are in jeopody.
If you are really a strict constitutional conservative you will be supporting the one person who is opposing laws and ideas that will limit our rights and our freedoms as written in the constitution. Our constitution is under attack and you have no concept or idea that it is happening because of your support of one thing kaufman and his mission on eliminating Muslims in America. Yes I am against Sharia Law and I support exposing Islamic Terrorist and Eliminating them. But I am against stating that all Muslims are bad because they are not just like all Japanese are not all spies and enemies of this country after Pearl harbor. Just remember the Fighting 442nd , one of the most decorated fighting regiments in US history, made up of all Japanese Americans. Their amny Muslim Americans that fought for our freedom and died doing it. So we can not destroy the constitution because of a few people full of hate.
Hate to start this again tonight, but I don’t recall anyone saying, especially Joe Kaufman, that he hates Muslims as a whole. Knock it off Goldner. If you want to make comments, make them about yourself and give some specific times, places and statistics as to how you’ve protected our country, info that can be verified. On second thought, who cares. Don’t bother to respond to this as I have more important things to do.
Freida, I don’t hate people and you do. Hate is a very strong word to use but it looks like you and Kaufman love to use it. The people in district 20 don’t hate Debbie Wasserman Schultz like Kaufman loves to use. They don’t like her policies and support of Obama and his policies. They feel betrayed but hate no!
We have a dictionary for dummies to give to kaufman and you to look up the word hate and against.
Also we have enough hate in the world , we don’t need any more.
Kaufman, many people get picked on when they are growing up, but most do not use that as a personal vendetta towards anyone or any race or religion like you doing as you had said in several interviews.
No matter what happens in this race, I will tell you this, I pledge to make sure that we don’t elect a man of hate to represent anyone or anything. We have too much of that already. I also will not support Karen Harrington either because of all the personal attacks and threats towards me and my family. People like that should never get elected either.
HATE AND THREATS WILL NEVER WIN ANY ELECTION IN THIS COUNTRY. IT IS ALL ABOUT THE PEOPLE , THE CONSTITUTION AND POUR FREEDOMS AND NOTHING ELSE.
HATE AND THREATS WILL NEVER WIN ANY ELECTION IN THIS COUNTRY. IT IS ALL ABOUT THE PEOPLE , THE CONSTITUTION AND OUR FREEDOMS AND NOTHING ELSE.
One last statement. Please don’t try pulling words from my mouth. You must have nothing to campaign on and no accomplishments to brag about. You may have a good heart, but people with good hearts don’t spout such mean vicious lies about other people. You sound like a Democrat.
Toot your own horn, Goldner. Actions speak louder than words. No one is threatening you, and no one hates you, yet. It’s not nice to constantly find fault with other people. Actually, people get really tired of negative campaigning. Pick on DWS, praise yourself, admire yourself in the mirror, call more radio talk shows, do whatever makes you happy. Get ready for the big debates. They’re coming, you know. Think you can handle debating Debbie? Better spiff yourself up a little. But first you’ve got to make it through the May 7th petition deadline, then the August Primary. You’ve got a lot of competition. It’s not just Kaufman you have to battle, but I’ll admit, he’s your biggest
opponent………….That’s all, folks!!!!!
Thanks for the advice, I hope that Kaufman and Harrington both listen to your advice it will be greatly appreciated. The biggest threat is not Kaufman but Ozzie because of all the money he is going to throw in the rice. He is the Mitt Romney of this race and has indicated that he will throw in millions. But we will see. As for debates I am ready and as others have been asking in the district when are the candidates going to debate each other in front of them? For example Sunrise Lakes or in front of citizens in say Tamarac or Lauderhill or Sunrise? The people are looking to hear from all of the candidates and not looking to hear from special interest groups. They the people know me because I have been with them for more then a year, the others have not and have been only talking to special interest groups and that is a turn off to all of them.